<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: Lean GTD #6 &#8211; Perfection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/</link>
	<description>Work &#38; Play Creatively</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55249</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55249</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well. I still do almost no weekly reviews. I am running a fairly uncomplicated GTD-ish setup now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not doing it quite the way it&#039;s proposed in the lean gtd series. But the basic idea has sort of ingrained itself into my workflow. I will review the part of system that needs reviewing at the time it feels important, not on preset dates.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the main value of my Lead GTD work has been to get rid of a lot of the proces overhead that I used to have. It has become second nature to me to cut stuff from GTD flow. The weekly review batch and proces has been one of them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. I still do almost no weekly reviews. I am running a fairly uncomplicated GTD-ish setup now.</p>

<p>I'm not doing it quite the way it's proposed in the lean gtd series. But the basic idea has sort of ingrained itself into my workflow. I will review the part of system that needs reviewing at the time it feels important, not on preset dates.</p>

<p>I think the main value of my Lead GTD work has been to get rid of a lot of the proces overhead that I used to have. It has become second nature to me to cut stuff from GTD flow. The weekly review batch and proces has been one of them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55248</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sure go ahead.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure go ahead.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: cuttingEdge</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55230</link>
		<dc:creator>cuttingEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, I love your leanGTD image at the top of the page, do you mind if I use it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I love your leanGTD image at the top of the page, do you mind if I use it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: cuttingEdge</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55229</link>
		<dc:creator>cuttingEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What worked, what didn&#039;t? What are you doing now? Time for an a reality check eh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What worked, what didn't? What are you doing now? Time for an a reality check eh?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: J.J. Yong</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-36536</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J. Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-36536</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve read Lean solutions and I&#039;ve thought of combining it with GTD methods. Apparently, you&#039;ve done it a way ahead of me. Anyway, you&#039;ve done a great job!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read Lean solutions and I've thought of combining it with GTD methods. Apparently, you've done it a way ahead of me. Anyway, you've done a great job!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-12797</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-12797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi JJ&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks you for commenting. Good luck with implementing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jens Poder&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JJ</p>

<p>Thanks you for commenting. Good luck with implementing.</p>

<p>Regards</p>

<p>Jens Poder</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: JJ</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-12739</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-12739</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed reading this series.  I have learned about lean and gtd but never put them together.  Very nice.  I will give your pull system a try.  And you have gained a reader.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading this series.  I have learned about lean and gtd but never put them together.  Very nice.  I will give your pull system a try.  And you have gained a reader.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-8303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kim&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My Archiving and Someday/Maybe routines have been the same for some time now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use hanging file folders for my Reference archive, and the ToDo-lists in Outlook for my Someday/Maybe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right now I&#039;m not totally happy about my archiving system. I use a labeler and a hanging files. And it&#039;s a little slow. But it&#039;s not a big problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My main focus is on standardizing my new system. I need to train myself in the new habits to reap the benefits of change.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Jens Poder&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kim</p>

<p>My Archiving and Someday/Maybe routines have been the same for some time now.</p>

<p>I use hanging file folders for my Reference archive, and the ToDo-lists in Outlook for my Someday/Maybe.</p>

<p>Right now I'm not totally happy about my archiving system. I use a labeler and a hanging files. And it's a little slow. But it's not a big problem.</p>

<p>My main focus is on standardizing my new system. I need to train myself in the new habits to reap the benefits of change.</p>

<ul>
<li>Jens Poder</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Kim Bille</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-8297</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Bille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-8297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jens&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I found this series of articles very interesting to read and found my self nodding along at many of your points. Fx. the point of &quot;feeling&quot; the clutter in a todo-list. I didn&#039;t realize that is what happened, but you made it a conscious thing for me now&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would also be interested to head you views on the other half, so to speak, of GTD. That is the archiving part/the someday-maybe part. Do you use LEAN on that as well or is it something you simple don&#039;t use GTD for?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jens</p>

<p>I found this series of articles very interesting to read and found my self nodding along at many of your points. Fx. the point of "feeling" the clutter in a todo-list. I didn't realize that is what happened, but you made it a conscious thing for me now</p>

<p>I would also be interested to head you views on the other half, so to speak, of GTD. That is the archiving part/the someday-maybe part. Do you use LEAN on that as well or is it something you simple don't use GTD for?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-7746</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-7746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Flemming&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good luck with implementing. It can be quite a personal journey :)
And thank you for commenting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Jens Poder&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Flemming</p>

<p>Good luck with implementing. It can be quite a personal journey :)
And thank you for commenting.</p>

<ul>
<li>Jens Poder</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
