<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: Lean GTD #6 &#8211; Perfection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/</link>
	<description>Work &#38; Play Creatively</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Joen</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-60095</link>
		<dc:creator>Joen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-60095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jens,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great article series. A real eye-opener for getting back on track with the dreaded weekly review. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jens,</p>

<p>Great article series. A real eye-opener for getting back on track with the dreaded weekly review. Thanks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Sarkunarajah S</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-59979</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarkunarajah S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-59979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jens,
Thank you for posting this. Combining GTD with LEAN was an excellent idea.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You article helped me to become conscious of the difficulties I was facing with GTD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sarkunarajah S&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jens,
Thank you for posting this. Combining GTD with LEAN was an excellent idea.</p>

<p>You article helped me to become conscious of the difficulties I was facing with GTD.</p>

<p>Thank you again.</p>

<p>Sarkunarajah S</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-57543</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-57543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m running it even leaner now :) I have completed abandoned my attempt to implement GTD as such. It&#039;s simply to rigid for my use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that the most important point that I have learned form my GTD period is this one. If you can do it quickly then do it now! Don&#039;t stockpile stuff to do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea about writing stuff down... well... it can also be a trap. You risk ending up spending to much time handling enormous inventories of trivial tasks that aren&#039;t all that important.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do a kind of GTD today, but I have totally dropped the idea about writing down that someday/maybe @hardware i might want to buy staples. It&#039;s just a complete waste of time in my opinion. I you wan&#039;t to spend time on those kind of acitivities then organize your sock drawer instead :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem about GTD, I think, is that it doesn&#039;t put enough emphasis on the triage part of task handling. It&#039;s in there in the gtd thinking, it&#039;s just drowned out by all the talk about trivial office supply optimization stuff.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use Things now a days, and only for the important high priority stuff. There&#039;s no someday/maybe cut hairs in ears stuff in there. Once a week i look at the list of projects that I have going, and consider which project will need attention. The other ones gets scheduled to start in 7 days, so all tasks relating to these disappear. That allows me to focus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks you for reading.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Jens Poder&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew</p>

<p>I'm running it even leaner now :) I have completed abandoned my attempt to implement GTD as such. It's simply to rigid for my use.</p>

<p>I think that the most important point that I have learned form my GTD period is this one. If you can do it quickly then do it now! Don't stockpile stuff to do.</p>

<p>The idea about writing stuff down... well... it can also be a trap. You risk ending up spending to much time handling enormous inventories of trivial tasks that aren't all that important.</p>

<p>I do a kind of GTD today, but I have totally dropped the idea about writing down that someday/maybe @hardware i might want to buy staples. It's just a complete waste of time in my opinion. I you wan't to spend time on those kind of acitivities then organize your sock drawer instead :)</p>

<p>The problem about GTD, I think, is that it doesn't put enough emphasis on the triage part of task handling. It's in there in the gtd thinking, it's just drowned out by all the talk about trivial office supply optimization stuff.</p>

<p>I use Things now a days, and only for the important high priority stuff. There's no someday/maybe cut hairs in ears stuff in there. Once a week i look at the list of projects that I have going, and consider which project will need attention. The other ones gets scheduled to start in 7 days, so all tasks relating to these disappear. That allows me to focus.</p>

<p>Thanks you for reading.</p>

<ul>
<li>Jens Poder</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-57530</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-57530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jens,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious about the uncomplicated GTD setup you are running now. I tried to run a GTD system with various tools/software/PDA and failed to implement it completely due to too much overhead and MUDA. Hope to know how your new lean GTD works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Andrew&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jens,</p>

<p>I'm curious about the uncomplicated GTD setup you are running now. I tried to run a GTD system with various tools/software/PDA and failed to implement it completely due to too much overhead and MUDA. Hope to know how your new lean GTD works.</p>

<p>Andrew</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55249</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55249</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well. I still do almost no weekly reviews. I am running a fairly uncomplicated GTD-ish setup now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not doing it quite the way it&#039;s proposed in the lean gtd series. But the basic idea has sort of ingrained itself into my workflow. I will review the part of system that needs reviewing at the time it feels important, not on preset dates.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the main value of my Lead GTD work has been to get rid of a lot of the proces overhead that I used to have. It has become second nature to me to cut stuff from GTD flow. The weekly review batch and proces has been one of them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. I still do almost no weekly reviews. I am running a fairly uncomplicated GTD-ish setup now.</p>

<p>I'm not doing it quite the way it's proposed in the lean gtd series. But the basic idea has sort of ingrained itself into my workflow. I will review the part of system that needs reviewing at the time it feels important, not on preset dates.</p>

<p>I think the main value of my Lead GTD work has been to get rid of a lot of the proces overhead that I used to have. It has become second nature to me to cut stuff from GTD flow. The weekly review batch and proces has been one of them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55248</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sure go ahead.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure go ahead.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: cuttingEdge</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55230</link>
		<dc:creator>cuttingEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, I love your leanGTD image at the top of the page, do you mind if I use it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I love your leanGTD image at the top of the page, do you mind if I use it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: cuttingEdge</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-55229</link>
		<dc:creator>cuttingEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-55229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What worked, what didn&#039;t? What are you doing now? Time for an a reality check eh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What worked, what didn't? What are you doing now? Time for an a reality check eh?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: J.J. Yong</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-36536</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J. Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-36536</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve read Lean solutions and I&#039;ve thought of combining it with GTD methods. Apparently, you&#039;ve done it a way ahead of me. Anyway, you&#039;ve done a great job!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read Lean solutions and I've thought of combining it with GTD methods. Apparently, you've done it a way ahead of me. Anyway, you've done a great job!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: jens.poder</title>
		<link>http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/comment-page-1/#comment-12797</link>
		<dc:creator>jens.poder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 08:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poder.dk/2007/09/14/lean-gtd-6-perfection/#comment-12797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi JJ&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks you for commenting. Good luck with implementing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jens Poder&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JJ</p>

<p>Thanks you for commenting. Good luck with implementing.</p>

<p>Regards</p>

<p>Jens Poder</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

